Two nearly identical frames, different only by 1/3 of a second.  Equally so, two nearly identical men — identical in that one is as differently the same as the other.

It’s a question of an individual’s essential diversity-in-unity.  Not that the left frame is an other man from the right frame but that the left precedes the right by 1/3 of a second, cognitively and experientially (among others).

And it is with the increase in experience and empirical broadening a more precise articulation of the “Why” and the “How” of the “What Is.”

In the fluidity of time, Evan is the same man, and yet Evan is a different man. This among the many beautiful paradoxes of being and becoming.